Neville Goddard vs. Ramana Maharshi: The Truth About Reality

One of the most fascinating questions in spirituality is whether we create our own reality or whether everything is already predetermined. On one hand, Neville Goddard’s Law of Manifestation tells us that we can manifest anything we desire by assuming the feeling of already having it. On the other, Ramana Maharshi teaches that everything is dictated by destiny and that trying to change our fate is futile.

At first glance, these two views seem contradictory. If everything is already written, then what is the point of manifesting? But if manifestation truly works, does that mean fate is not real? Let’s explore both perspectives and see if they can actually be reconciled.

Neville Goddard: You Are the Creator of Your Reality

Neville Goddard’s teachings emphasize that imagination is the divine creative force. He believed that by living as if our desires are already fulfilled, we bring them into reality. According to this view, our external world is simply a reflection of our internal state. The universe responds to our feelings and beliefs, making manifestation a conscious and deliberate process.

For example, if you believe and feel that you are already successful, the world will eventually mirror that belief. The key is to fully embody the state of having what you desire, without doubt or resistance.

Ramana Maharshi: Surrender to the Divine and Accept Destiny

Ramana Maharshi, one of India’s greatest sages, had a completely different approach. He often spoke about prarabdha karma (the karma that unfolds in one’s lifetime) and how everything is predetermined by the divine will. From this perspective, trying to change our external reality through personal effort is meaningless because what is meant to happen will happen, no matter what.

Ramana advocated the path of self-inquiry (Who am I?), urging seekers to transcend their sense of individuality and surrender to the higher Self. Instead of chasing desires, he encouraged us to dissolve the ego and recognize that the true Self is beyond manifestation and destiny alike.

How Can These Two Views Coexist?

At first, it seems impossible to reconcile these two perspectives, but a deeper look reveals a potential harmony:

  1. Manifestation and Destiny Can Be Two Sides of the Same Coin
  • What we desire and try to manifest may itself be part of our predetermined path. If something is meant for us, we may naturally feel drawn to it and manifest it with ease.
  • If something is truly not in our destiny, we may struggle no matter how much we try to manifest it.
  1. Inner vs. Outer Reality
  • Neville’s teachings help us navigate and shape our external world through belief and feeling.
  • Ramana’s wisdom teaches us to go beyond the external world and recognize the deeper reality where nothing needs to be manifested because we already are complete.
  1. The Role of Self-Realization
  • Neville’s approach is useful when operating as an individual in the world, helping us improve our life circumstances.
  • Ramana’s path leads to the dissolution of the ego itself, where the concepts of manifestation and destiny dissolve into the eternal truth.

So, Which One is True?

The answer depends on how we see ourselves:

  • If we see ourselves as individuals navigating life, manifestation seems real and powerful.
  • If we seek ultimate truth, Ramana’s teaching shows that everything, including manifestation, is just part of the greater play of consciousness.

Perhaps the best approach is to blend both perspectives:
✨ Use Neville’s teachings to create a fulfilling life in the material world.
🕉 Follow Ramana’s wisdom to transcend attachment and accept life as it unfolds.

Both paths lead to greater awareness—one through creation, the other through surrender. The choice, perhaps, is also part of destiny!

What do you think? Have you experienced moments where manifestation worked? Or do you feel that life unfolds as per destiny no matter what?